I know it's early days, but Chrome works SO well with Google Apps (as much as I like Firefox).  The only significant missing component from Chrome from my point of view is HTML signatures.  And, as brilliantly useful as your Firefox add-in is, I and many others would no doubt end up going with whoever can supply a product for Chrome.

Jerome:

I think what he's asking for (and what I was about to request) is that you create a version of BC Gmail Signatures that will work from Google's Chrome browser.

I'm a big fan of Firefox, but even version 3 has some huge problems with memory management. I understand that Chrome starts a new, seperate process for each tab (and each plugin, such as Flash). Therefore, when you close a tab, you automagically recover the memory used. In Firefox, even with only three or four tabs open, I routinely end up with a >150,000K footprint, and an inevitable system crash. If there's a way to make BC Gmail Sigs work in Chrome, I'd be one happy camper.

- captaindigital

I would like to second Nick's emotion.   I've used the Google Chrome browser for a very short time, but I'm already falling in love with it.  Very clean interface, loads super fast, and (as has been mentioned) works so nicely with other google products.   If you could develop an HTML gmail signatures ap for "Chrome" it would be the best combo since peanut butter and jelly. 

I just finished taking a look at Google Chrome and it looks like there is as of yet absolutely no support for add-ons of any kind. I'll have to wait until it matures a little and they begin supporting add-ons.

I was just looking through the "Google Labs" tab in Chrome and there is a new funcitionality to add any "gadget" by url. I am not a code-writing expert, but wouldn't that be a sufficient window for BC to add Gmail Signatures??

I recently read (but i do not remember the source i think it was Lifehacker) that Chrome is capable of running greasemonkey-like scripts with an external program. Since this addon used to be a greasemonkey script, i am sure it will be portable to Chrome somehow.

I saw this agreed with it so much I thought that I may have started the thread.  HTML sigs is the only thing from preventing me from using Chrome exclusively (ok maybe adblock too, but that's kinda biting the hand that feeds google--at least chrome hides the pop up ads well).  I use Google Apps and have my business email hosted by Google, it's just not possible for me to use my email if I can't have a proper signature.  I guess I'll have to stick with FF3 for now.  Thanks for creating HTML sigs for FF!

Chrome only supports Greasemonkey style scripts and the add-on has evolved a good bit beyond that at this point. Converting Better Gmail 2 was probably easy because it's just a combination of Greasemonkey scripts to begin with. While I could possible down-engineer the add-on to be contained in a single script, I probably won't do so until the add-on scene matures for Chrome. Sorry all, but I just don't have the time for it, nor the real inclination given the (currently) relatively small user population for Chrome versus Firefox. Maybe some day.

In the meantime, you are welcome to use the old Greasemonkey version of my add-on if you can get it converted.

Old Greasemonkey Version

I am also very interested, as Google Chrome now has support for extensions, too.

Allthough I still use FF, I very often use Google Chrome browser (GCB). Especcially when FF is not open, and I want to have a quick view at some page. GCB, even in version 4.x, is blazing fast. And.... indeed, it now supports extentions. So, as soon as the most important add-on's I use have been ported from FF to GCB, I will definitly switch over completely.

So I subscribe to the post-start.

Ventiman

Give this a try freinds. https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/cmjcoiohflenpehfaalahocpmacjloof

I have just installed it, I will post back if it works like garbage.